(select all that apply)

(Select all that apply)

(Canada, all employees)

(1 = Not a pain point, 5 = Severe pain point)

(select all that apply)

(1 = None / aligned; 5 = High / repeated work or re‑training required)

Please feel free to add comments regarding these pain points

Safety programs & audits

• COR/SECOR audits and equivalency acceptance
  
• Safety manual expectations (policies/procedures)
  
• Hazard/Risk assessment formats & frequency
  
• Incident reporting
  
• Subcontractor management requirements 

Please feel free to add comment on the pain points:

• Fall protection / Elevated work platforms
  
• Confined space
  
• First aid requirements/levels
  
• Electrical/mechanical trade‑specific safety modules
  

Please feel free to provide additional commentary about these pain points:

Client/owner pre-qualification & platforms

• Multiple platforms with similar question sets
  
• Data not recognized across platforms (no “portability”)
  
• Varying document formats/expiry rules
  
• Site‑specific orientations duplicating content 
  

Please provide additional context to:

In the last 12 months, did you repeat an audit or training solely to satisfy a different province’s requirement (no material content change)?

Select up to 3

1=Do not support, 5=Strongly support 

Pick one. 

This would include uploading once, and reusing many times.

1=Valuable, 5=Extremely Valuable 

(E.g., privacy, cost)

The federal government is reviewing a proposal that would keep safety training delivered by existing provincial, territorial, and organizational providers, while introducing a national framework for standardized testing—hosted federally but facilitated by the same entities that deliver the training. This framework would leverage a national occupational safety standard to maintain training at its highest level, enable mutual recognition of certifications across Canada, reduce duplication, curb monetization, and preserve jurisdictional autonomy. Would you support this approach?